GOP’s Gerrymandering Called Racist, but ‘Obamamandering’ Just Politics

The term “gerrymander” derives from Elbridge Gerry, a Founding Father and vice president who, as governor of Massachusetts, approved an oddly drawn state Senate district to benefit his Democratic-Republican Party over the Federalist Party.

Both parties do it. Both parties complain when the other party does it to them.

Consider recent GOP “gerrymandering” efforts. Former President Barack Obama accused Republicans of “passing laws designed to prevent American citizens from exercising their right to vote. And drawing congressional maps that drown out the voice of ordinary people.”

Obama added: “Rather than argue, based on ideas, they are trying to tilt the playing field. And they aren’t even waiting for Election Day to do it. Their plan is to control state legislatures and congressional delegations before a single vote is cast. That is not how democracy is supposed to work.”

Former Attorney General Eric Holder—Obama’s self-described “wingman”—also denounced the Republican maneuvers. Holder called for “fair line drawing” while blasting Republicans who “gamed” the system.

Obama and Holder assume or hope we suffer from memory loss. Holder’s former boss not only benefited from gerrymandering, but one could argue that without it there would have been no President Obama.

In 1999, Illinois state Sen. Barack Obama lost badly in the primary election for Chicago’s South Side seat in the U.S. House to a fellow Democrat, incumbent Rep. Bobby Rush.

According to ProPublica: “Two years later, with the Democrats in control of Illinois redistricting, Obama was apparently able to reshape his state Senate district to his own specifications, which included drawing in wealthy supporters from Chicago’s Gold Coast.”

Chicago Democrat John Corrigan, who worked on the redistricting, called it “a radical change.” Obama’s new district was, according to The New Yorker’s Ryan Lizza, “wealthier, whiter, more Jewish, less blue-collar and better educated.”

Lizza wrote:

Corrigan remembers two things about the district that he and Obama drew. First, it retained Obama’s Hyde Park base—he had managed to beat Rush in Hyde Park—then swooped upward along the lakefront and toward downtown. By the end of the final redistricting process, his new district bore little resemblance to his old one. Rather than jutting far to the west, like a long thin dagger, into a swath of poor black neighborhoods of bungalow homes, Obama’s map now shot north, encompassing about half of the Loop, whose southern portion was beginning to be transformed by developers like Tony Rezko, and stretched far up Michigan Avenue and into the Gold Coast, covering much of the city’s economic heart, its main retail thoroughfares, and its finest museums, parks, skyscrapers, and lakefront apartment buildings.

Because this new district helped Obama gain influential contacts and financial resources, Lizza said Obama’s gerrymandering “may have been the most important event in Obama’s early political life.”

Gerrymandering was not the only hard-boiled tactic employed by the young, ambitious politician. Obama engaged in what Democrats today would call “voter suppression” to win his state Senate seat in the first place.

To qualify to run, Illinois state Senate candidates must obtain a specific number of valid signatures on a petition. Obama challenged the legitimacy of the signatures on the petitions of his three rivals, including the incumbent, resulting in their disqualification.

Will Burns, then a young volunteer for Obama, said that petition-challenging is “one of the first things you do whenever you’re in the middle of a primary race, especially in primaries in Chicago, because if you don’t have signatures to get on the ballot, you save yourself a lot of time and effort from having to raise money and have a full-blown campaign effort against an incumbent.”

This is exactly what Team Obama did. According to a CNN article about Obama’s first race: “If names were printed instead of signed in cursive writing, they were declared invalid. If signatures were good but the person gathering the signatures wasn’t properly registered, those petitions also were thrown out.”

Obama ran unopposed on the Democratic ticket. One of the candidates targeted and eliminated, Gha-is Askia, said: “It wasn’t honorable. I wouldn’t have done it.”

But today, about gerrymandering and alleged Republican “voter suppression,” Obama now says, “That is not how democracy is supposed to work.”

That is certainly how democracy worked in Chicago, however.

COPYRIGHT 2022 LAURENCE A. ELDER

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

The Daily Signal publishes a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Heritage Foundation.

Have an opinion about this article? To sound off, please email letters@DailySignal.com and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the url or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state.

The post GOP’s Gerrymandering Called Racist, but ‘Obamamandering’ Just Politics appeared first on The Daily Signal.